Interactions in a High Immigration Context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60758/laer.v34i.358Keywords:
Immigration, Cooperation, Coordination, Trust, Economic Interactions, Lab ExperimentsAbstract
Sudden massive migration influxes have been a new driving force of migration increases in recent decades. These types of migration flows present potential challenges to social and economic integration. In this paper we study socioeconomic integration using controlled laboratory experiments in a context of massive inflow of Venezuelan migrants in Peru, where the share of Venezuelan immigrants in the country’s population increased from almost zero in 2016 to 2.5 percent in 2019. Using adult (non-student) native-born Peruvians and Venezuelan immigrants as subjects, we conducted homogeneous (same nationality) and
mixed (different nationality) experimental sessions in Lima, to examine interactions that require cooperation, coordination, trust, and reciprocity to achieve a Pareto efficient outcome. We find no evidence of in-group versus out-group (based on nationality) difference in those measures of pro-social behavior. Within this context, we also find no differentials in normative or empirical expectations in behavior of non-nationals relative to those of nationals, and only small to moderate implicit bias. This lack of differential treatment is suggestive of short-run economic integration between immigrants and natives, in a challenging context of massive influxes of migrants.
References
Adida, C., Laitin, D., and Valfort, M.-A. (2014). Muslims in France: identifying a discriminatory equilibrium. Journal of Population Economics, 27(4):1039–1086.
Adida, C., Laitin, D., and Valfort, M.-A. (2016). ‘one muslim is enough!’ evidence from a field experiment in France. Annals of Economics and Statistics, 121-122:121–160.
Barron, K., Harmgart, H., Huck, S., Schneider, S., and Sutter, M. (2020). Discrimination, narratives and family history: An experiment with Jordanian host and Syrian refugee children. MPI Collective Goods Discussion Paper, pages 2020–13.
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., and McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1):122–142.
Bicchieri, C. (2005). The grammar of society: The nature and dynamics of social norms. Cambridge University Press.
Charness, G., Gneezy, U., and Kuhn, M. (2012). Experimental methods: Between-subject and within-subject design. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 81(1):1–8.
Chen, Y. and Li, S. X. (2009). Group identity and social preferences. American Economic Review, 99(1):431–457.
Chen, Y., Li, S. X., Liu, T. X., and Shih,M. (2014). Which hat to wear? impact of natural identities on coordination and cooperation. Games and Economic Behavior,, 84:58–86.
Cox, J. C. and Orman, W. H. (2015). Trust and trustworthiness of immigrants and native-born americans. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 57:1–8.
Eckel, C. and Grossman, P. (2005). Managing diversity by creating team identity. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 58(3):371–392.
El-Bialy, N., Aranda, E. F., Nicklisch, A., Saleh, L., and Voigt, S. (2022). To cooperate or not to cooperate? an analysis of cooperation and peer punishment among Syrian refugees, Germans, and Jordanians. Journal of Economic Psychology, 89.
Fershman, C. and Gneezy, U. (2001). Discrimination in a segmented society: An experimental approach. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1):351–377.
Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10(2):171–178.
Fischbacher, U. and Follmi-Heusi, F. (2013). Lies in disguise—an experimental study on cheating. Journal of the European Economic Association, (11):525–547.
Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4):25–42.
Gandelman, N. and Lame, D. (2023). Trust towards migrants. Theory and Decision, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-023-09950-y.
Goette, L., Huffman, D., and Meier, S. (2006). The impact of group membership on cooperation and norm enforcement: Evidence using random assignment to real social groups. American Economic Review, 96(2):212–216.
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., and Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. Journal of personality and social psychology, 74(6):1464.
Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., and Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. an improved scoring algorithm. Journal of personality and social psychology, 85(2):197.
Haimovich, F. (2017). Equity, equality, and variety of higher education. At a Crossroads: Higher Education in Latin America and The Caribbean, pages 77–113.
Hassan, M., Mansour, S., Voigt, S., and Gadallah, M. (2022). When Syria was in Egypt’s land: Egyptians cooperate with syrians, but less with each other. Public Choice, 191:337–362.
IEP (2019). Conocimiento y actitudes hacia la migracion venezolana. Informe de Opinion.
Kimbrough, E. O. and Vostroknutov, A. (2018). A portable method of eliciting respect for social norms. Economics Letters, 168:147–150.
McCabe, K., Rigdon, M., and Smith, V. (2003). Positive reciprocity and intentions in trust games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 52(2):267–275.
Perez, E. O. (2010). Explicit evidence on the import of implicit attitudes: The IAT and immigration policy judgments. Political Behavior, 32:517–545.
Torres, J. and Galarza Arellano, F. B. (2024). Short-run labor market integration of venezuelan immigrants to Peru. International Migration Review, https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183231223729.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Diego Aycinena, Francisco Galarza Arellano, Javier Torres
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
LAER Copyright and License
Authors submitting articles to Latin American Economic Review (LAER), automatically grant this journal a license to publish. Copyright of all published material remains with the authors, who can reuse it in future work without needing to make reference to LAER. Similarly, any other contribution of material to the website (for example text, photographs, graphics, video or audio) automatically grants us a right to publish. Copyright, however, remains with the author(s).
Authors release their work under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the use has no derivatives, is non-commercial and appropriate credit to the author(s) is given. (If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.)
A human-readable summary of the licence:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Full legal text: