Assessing the impact of electricity subsides on electricity consumption
The case of selected Latin American countries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60758/laer.v33i.375Keywords:
Electricity subsidy, Regression discontinuity design, LACAbstract
This document evaluates the impact of electricity subsidies on electricity consumption in Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, and Peru. To do this, this paper uses a Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD) to estimate the impact of the social tariff coverage policy on household electricity expenditure. The main results show mixed evidence of the effect of electricity subsidies on electricity expenditure. For instance, eligible households in Brazil experience a decrease in average electricity expenditure compared to non-eligible households. Results for Argentina point to a null effect of the electricity subsidy on household electricity expenditure. In contrast, in Colombia, the subsidy would be related to an increase in average electricity expenditure, which suggests that there might be overconsumption in the eligible group. Finally, in Peru, the subsidy does not show evidence of any impact on electricity expenditure. Understanding the differential impacts in various countries of the Latin American region can help tailor more effective subsidy programs that better target the most vulnerable populations and improve the optimization of resources. This analysis is one of the very first documents that evaluate social tariff programs in the Latin American region using an impact evaluation method.
References
ANEEL – Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica (2020). Tarifa Social de Energia Elétrica. Available in: https://www.aneel.gov.br/tarifa-social-baixa-renda
Bergolo, M., & Galván, E. (2018). Intra-household behavioral responses to cash transfer programs. Evidence from a regression discontinuity design. World Development, 103, 100-118.
Bernal, N., Carpio, M. A., & Klein, T. J. (2017). The effects of access to health insurance: evidence from a regression discontinuity design in Peru. Journal of Public Economics, 154, 122-136.
Brasil. Lei nº 10.438, de 26 de abril de 2002. Dispõe sobre a expansão da oferta de energia elétrica emergencial, recomposição tarifária extraordinária, cria o Programa de Incentivo às Fontes Alternativas de Energia Elétrica (Proinfa), a Conta de Desenvolvimento Energético (CDE), dispõe sobre a universalização do serviço público de energia elétrica, dá nova redação às Leis n o 9.427, de 26 de dezembro de 1996, nº 9.648, de 27 de maio de 1998, nº 3.890-A, de 25 de abril de 1961, nº 5.655, de 20 de maio de 1971, nº 5.899, de 5 de julho de 1973, nº 9.991, de 24 de julho de 2000, e dá outras providências.
Brasil. Decreto nº 7.583, de 13 de outubro de 2011. Regulamenta a aplicação da Tarifa Social de Energia Elétrica, e dá outras providências.
Brasil. Lei nº 12.212, de 20 de janeiro de 2010. Dispõe sobre a Tarifa Social de Energia Elétrica; altera as Leis nos 9.991, de 24 de julho de 2000, 10.925, de 23 de julho de 2004, e 10.438, de 26 de abril de 2002; e dá outras providências.
Bruhn, M., & McKenzie, D. (2019). Can grants to consortia spur innovation and science-industry collaboration? Regression-discontinuity evidence from Poland. The World Bank Economic Review, 33(3), 690-716.
Calonico, S., Cattaneo, M. D., & Titiunik, R. (2014). Robust nonparametric confidence intervals for regression‐discontinuity designs. Econometrica, 82(6), 2295-2326.
Calonico, S., Cattaneo, M. D., Farrell, M. H., & Titiunik, R. (2017). rdrobust: Software for regression-discontinuity designs. The Stata Journal, 17(2), 372-404.
Cattaneo, M. D., Jansson, M., & Ma, X. (2020). Simple local polynomial density estimators. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 115(531), 1449-1455.
Clements, M. B. J., Coady, M. D., Fabrizio, M. S., Gupta, M. S., Alleyne, M. T. S. C., & Sdralevich, M. C. A. (2013). Energy subsidy reform: lessons and implications. International Monetary Fund.
Coady, D., Parry, I., Sears, L., & Shang, B. (2017). How large are global fossil fuel subsidies?. World Development, 91, 11-27.
DANE (2019). Pobreza monetaria por departamentos en Colombia. Boletín Técnico. Available in: https://www.dane.gov.co/files/investigaciones/condiciones_vida/pobreza/2019/Boletin-pobreza-monetaria-dptos_2019.pdf
Del Granado, F. J. A., Coady, D., & Gillingham, R. (2012). The unequal benefits of fuel subsidies: A review of evidence for developing countries. World Development, 40(11), 2234-2248.
Eras, J. J. C., Fandino, J. M. M., Gutiérrez, A. S., Bayona, J. G. R., & German, S. J. S. (2022). The inequality of electricity consumption in Colombia. Projections and implications. Energy, 249, 123711.
Firpo, S., Pieri, R., Pedroso Jr, E., & Souza, A. P. (2014). Evidence of eligibility manipulation for conditional cash transfer programs. EconomiA, 15(3), 243-260.
Gangopadhyay, S., Ramaswami, B., & Wadhwa, W. (2005). Reducing subsidies on household fuels in India: how will it affect the poor?. Energy Policy, 33(18), 2326-2336.
Giuliano, F., Lugo, M. A., Masut, A., & Puig, J. (2020). Distributional effects of reducing energy subsidies: Evidence from recent policy reform in Argentina. Energy Economics, 92, 104980.
González-Eguino, M. (2015). Energy poverty: An overview. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 47, 377-385.
Hahn, J., Todd, P., & Van der Klaauw, W. (2001). Identification and estimation of treatment effects with a regression-discontinuity design. Econometrica, 69(1), 201-209.
Hancevic, P., Cont, W., & Navajas, F. (2016). Energy populism and household welfare. Energy Economics, 56, 464-474.
Inchauste, G., & Victor, D. G. (Eds.). (2017). The political economy of energy subsidy reform. World Bank Publications.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos (INDEC). (2019). Incidencia de la pobreza y la indigencia en 31 aglomerados urbanos. Segundo semestre de 2018. Available in: https://www.indec.gob.ar/uploads/informesdeprensa/eph_pobreza_02_18.pdf
Iqbal, N., & Nawaz, S. (2021). Cash transfers and residential demand for electricity: insights from BISP, Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(12), 14401-14422.
Khalid, S. A., & Salman, V. (2020). Welfare impact of electricity subsidy reforms in Pakistan: a micro model study. Energy Policy, 137, 111097.
Komives, K., Halpern, J., Foster, V., Wodon, Q., & Abdullah, R. (2007). Utility subsidies as social transfers: An empirical evaluation of targeting performance. Development Policy Review, 25(6), 659-679.
Komives, K., Foster, V., Halpern, J., & Wodon, Q. (2005). Water, electricity, and the poor: Who benefits from utility subsidies?. World Bank Publications.
Marcoje, B., Schiavon, L., Weiss, M., & Hallack, M. (2022). Evaluation of the Brazilian Electricity Subsidy Policy. Inter-American Development Bank.
Meléndez, M. (2008). Subsidios al consumo de los servicios públicos: reflexiones a partir del caso colombiano (No. 216). CAF Development Bank of Latinoamerica.
Mulugetta, Y., Hagan, E. B., & Kammen, D. (2019). Energy access for sustainable development. Environmental Research Letters, 14(2), 020201.
Nawaz, S., & Iqbal, N. (2020). The impact of unconditional cash transfer on fuel choices among ultra-poor in Pakistan: quasi-experimental evidence from the Benazir income support program. Energy Policy, 142, 111535.
Oré, M. A. H., Sousa, L. D., & Tornarolli, L. (Eds.). (2017). Fiscal and welfare impacts of electricity subsidies in Central America. World Bank Publications.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2003). Environmentally harmful subsidies: Policy issues and challenges. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Pacudan, R., & Hamdan, M. (2019). Electricity tariff reforms, welfare impacts, and energy poverty implications. Energy Policy, 132, 332-343.
Pollard, S. L., Williams, K. N., O'Brien, C. J., Winiker, A., Puzzolo, E., Kephart, J. L., ... & Checkley, W. (2018). An evaluation of the Fondo de Inclusión Social Energético program to promote access to liquefied petroleum gas in Peru. Energy for Sustainable Development, 46, 82-93.
Sanin, M. E. (2019). Zooming into Successful Energy Policies in Latin America and the Caribbean: Reasons for Hope. Inter-American Development Bank.
Schwartz, G., & Clements, B. (1999). Government subsidies. Journal of Economic Surveys, 13(2), 119-148.
Thistlethwaite, D. L., & Campbell, D. T. (1960). Regression-discontinuity analysis: An alternative to the ex post facto experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51(6), 309–317.
Troncoso, K., & da Silva, A. S. (2017). LPG fuel subsidies in Latin America and the use of solid fuels to cook. Energy Policy, 107, 188-196.
Vagliasindi, M. (2012). Implementing energy subsidy reforms: Evidence from developing countries. World Bank Publications. Retrieved from: https://books.google.com.ec/books?hl=es&lr=&id=709IhPbvf00C&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Implementing+Energy+Subsidy+Reforms&ots=XYfjJBDOCa&sig=3B8F2L2iYSsbphmN7lhbL28r2LE&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Implementing%20Energy%20Subsidy%20Reforms&f=false
Vélez Tamayo, J. F. (2019). Electricity Cross-Subsidies in Colombia: an alternative targeting proposal (Master dissertation, Universidad EAFIT).
Whitley, S., & van der Burg, L. (2015). Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reform: From Rhetoric to Reality. New Climate Economy, London and Washington, DC. Available at http://newclimateeconomy. report/misc/working-papers
World Bank. (2007). Social Protection for a Changing India. Two-volume Social Protection Report for the Government of India, South Asia Region, World Bank, Washington, DC.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Segundo Camino-Mogro, Karla Arias
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
LAER Copyright and License
Authors submitting articles to Latin American Economic Review (LAER), automatically grant this journal a license to publish. Copyright of all published material remains with the authors, who can reuse it in future work without needing to make reference to LAER. Similarly, any other contribution of material to the website (for example text, photographs, graphics, video or audio) automatically grants us a right to publish. Copyright, however, remains with the author(s).
Authors release their work under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the use has no derivatives, is non-commercial and appropriate credit to the author(s) is given. (If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.)
A human-readable summary of the licence:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Full legal text: