Closing the achievement gap in mathematics: evidence from a remedial program in Mexico City
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40503-014-0014-2Keywords:
Impact evaluation, Remedial education programs, Differencein-differences estimatorAbstract
This paper evaluates the impact of an intervention targeted at marginalized low-performance students in public secondary schools in Mexico City. The program consisted in offering free additional math courses, taught by undergraduate students from some of the most prestigious Mexican universities, to the lowest performance students in a set of marginalized schools in Mexico City. We exploit the information available in all students’ (treated and not treated by the program) transcripts enrolled in participating and non-participating schools. Before the implementation of the program, participating students lagged behind non-participating ones by more than a half base point in their GPA (over 10). Using a difference-in-differences approach, we find that students participating in the program observed a higher increase in their school grades after the implementation of the program, and that the difference in grades between the two groups decreases over time. By the end of the school year (when the free extra courses had been offered, on average, for 10 weeks), participating students’ grades were not significantly lower than non-participating students’ grades. These results provide some evidence that short and low-cost interventions can have important effects on student achievement.
References
Almlund M, Lee A, Heckman J (2011) Personality psychology and economics. Handbook of economics of education, chapter 1, vol 4
Angrist J, Bettinger E, Bloom E, King E, Kremer M (2002) Vouchers for private schooling in colombia: evidence from a randomized natural experiment. Am Econ Rev 92(5):1535–1558
Banerjee A, Jacob S, Kremer M (2004) Promoting school participation in rural Rajasthan: results from some prospective trials, MIT Department of Economics, Working paper
Banerjee A, Cole S, Duflo E, Linden L (2008) Remedying education: evidence from two randomized experiments in India. Quart J Econ, MIT Press 122(3):1235–1264
Barham, Tania, Karen Macours, and John A. Maluccio (2013) “More Schooling and More Learnings? Effects of a Three-Year Conditional Cash Transfer Program in Nicaragua after 10 years”. IDB Working Paper Series No. IDB-WP-432
Barrera-Osorio F, Linden LL (2009) The use and misuse of computers in education: evidence from a randomized experiment in Colombia. World bank policy research working paper series, vol 2009
Behrman JR, Parker SW, Todd PE (2011) Do conditional cash transfers for schooling generate lasting benefits? A five-year followup of PROGRESA/Oportunidades. J Hum Resour 46(1):93–122
Bowen William G, Chingos Mathew, McPherson Michael (2009) Test scores and high school grades as predictors. Crossing the Finish Line: Completing College at America’s Public Universities”. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp 112–133
Cabezas, Verónica, José I. Cuesta, and Francisco A. Gallego (2011) “Effects of Short Term Tutoring on Cognitive and Non Cognitive Skills: Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation in Chile”, Instituto de Economía, P. Universidad Católica de Chile, Working paper
Chay Kenneth Y, McEwan Patrick J, Urquiola Miguel (2005) The central Role of Noise in Evaluating Interventions that Use Test Scores to Rank Schools. Am Econ Rev 95(4):1237–1258
Duckworth AL, Quinn PD, Tsukayama E (2012) What no child left behind leaves behind: the roles of IQ and self-control in predicting standardized achievement test scores and report card grades. J Educ Psycol 104(2):439–451
Duflo Esther (2001) Schooling and labor market consequences of school construction in Indonesia: evidence from an unusual policy experiment. Am Econ Rev Am Econ Assoc 91(4):795–813
Duflo E, Hanna R, Rya SP (2012) Incentives work: getting teachers to come to school. Am Econ Rev 102(4):1241–1278
Geiser S, Santelices MV (2007) Validity of high school grades in predicting student success beyond the freshman year: high-school record VS. standardized tests as indicators of four-year college outcomes. Center for Studies in Higher Education at the University of California, Berkeley CSHE
Glewwe P, Kremer M, Moulin S (2002) Textbooks and test scores: evidence from a prospective evaluation in Kenya. BREAD Working Paper, Cambridge, MA
INEE (2012) Panorama Educativo de México 2012 Indicadores del Sistema Educativo Nacional. México, Instituto Nacional para la Evaluación de la Educación (INEE)
Jensen R (2010) The perceived returns to education and the demand for schooling. Q J Econ 125(2):515–548
Kremer M, Brannen C, Glennerster R (2013) The challenge of education and learning in the developing world. Science 340:297–300
Kuncel NR, Hezlett SA (2007) Standardized tests predict graduate students’ success. Science 315:1080–1081
Lavy V, Schlosser A (2005) Targeted remedial education for underperforming teenagers: cost and benefits. J Labor Econ XXIII:839–874
McEwan PJ, Santibañez L (2005) Teacher incentives and student achievement: evidence from a large-scale reform in Mexico (unpublished paper)
Oliver PH, Guerin DW, Gottfried AW (2007) Temperamental task orientation: relation to high school and college educational accomplishments. Learn Ind Differ 17(3):220–230
Sackett PR, Borneman MJ, Connelly BS (2008) High stakes testing in higher education and employment: appraising the evidence for validity and fairness. Am Psychol 63(4):215–227
Willingham WW, Pollack JM, Lewis C (2002) Grades and test scores: accounting for observed differences. J Educ Meas 39(1):1–37
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Emilio Gutiérrez, Rodimiro Rodrigo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
LAER Copyright and License
Authors submitting articles to Latin American Economic Review (LAER), automatically grant this journal a license to publish. Copyright of all published material remains with the authors, who can reuse it in future work without needing to make reference to LAER. Similarly, any other contribution of material to the website (for example text, photographs, graphics, video or audio) automatically grants us a right to publish. Copyright, however, remains with the author(s).
Authors release their work under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the use has no derivatives, is non-commercial and appropriate credit to the author(s) is given. (If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.)
A human-readable summary of the licence:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Full legal text: